Pendekatan Formatif dan Sumatif untuk Meningkatkan Mutu Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61404/jimad.v4i1.451Keywords:
Evaluation, Formative, Summative, LearningAbstract
Educational program evaluation serves as a strategic element to ensure the improvement of learning quality at the elementary school level, particularly as schools are required to be adaptive to students’ diverse learning needs. A major issue frequently encountered is teachers’ limited capacity to implement evaluation models that are simple, sustainable, and relevant as a basis for instructional decision-making. This study aims to analyze the application of simple evaluation through formative and summative approaches as a systematic effort to enhance the quality of learning in elementary schools. The formative approach is employed throughout the instructional process to provide immediate feedback, identify students’ learning difficulties, and adjust teaching strategies in real time, while the summative approach is applied at the end of the instructional period to assess the level of goal attainment and the overall effectiveness of the program. The findings indicate that a balanced implementation of both approaches enables teachers to design learning activities that are more responsive, measurable, and oriented toward continuous improvement. Practically designed simple evaluations also encourage teachers to take an active role as controllers of learning quality rather than merely as curriculum implementers. The conclusion of this study confirms that the integration of formative and summative evaluation in a simple yet systematic manner effectively improves learning quality while strengthening a reflective culture in elementary school settings. The novelty of this study lies in its emphasis on an evaluation model that is easy to apply, contextual, and oriented toward teachers’ daily pedagogical decision-making, thereby offering a practical alternative for elementary schools with limited formal evaluation resources.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, Mohamad Syarief, dan Hanifah. “Model Evaluasi Formatif dan Sumatif: Strategi untuk Meningkatkan Proses dan Hasil Pembelajaran di Pendidikan Dasar pada Kurikulum Merdeka.” MERDEKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin 2, no. 4 (2025): 30–35. https://jurnalistiqomah.org/index.php/merdeka/article/view/4131.
Creswell, John W., dan Vicki L. Plano Clark. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Edisi 3. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, 2018.
Felix, Fuan, dan Irmina Pinem. “Peran Evaluasi Formatif dan Sumatif dalam Meningkatkan Efektivitas Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar.” Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai 9, no. 2 (2025): 20995–20999. https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/29831.
Hikmah, Nur, Shabrina Safinatun Najah, Siti Haerunisa, Syaharani Subagyo, dan Vina Iasha. “Peran Evaluasi Formatif dan Sumatif untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar.” Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan 6, no. 3 (2024): 375–384. https://journalversa.com/s/index.php/jkp/article/view/3959.
Juwanda, Wagiran, dan Subyantoro. “Implementasi Model Evaluasi Formatif dan Sumatif dalam Pembelajaran Morfologi Bahasa Indonesia.” Deiksis: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia 10, no. 1 (2023): 98–102. https://jurnal.ugj.ac.id/index.php/Deiksis/article/view/9245.
Khasanah, Hilda Rilawati, Nurul Malikah, Ida Martafia Putri, Iffah Rahma Saniyah, Ihdaa Sabiila Faradisi, Imro’atus Azizah, dan Intan Muslimah. “Implementasi Evaluasi Formatif dan Sumatif dalam Pembelajaran Fikih di MTs Al-Mukarrom Ponorogo.” Muaddib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam 2, no. 2 (2024): 148–160. https://ejournal.insuriponorogo.ac.id/index.php/muaddib/article/view/6502.
Mestika Zed. Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 2014.
Miles, Matthew B., A. Michael Huberman, dan Johnny Saldana. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Cet. 3. California: SAGE Publications, 2014.
Mishra, Neelam. “Formative and Summative Review in the Classroom.” IJSSR: International Journal of Social Science Research 1, no. 1 (2024): 54–59. https://www.ijssr.com/papers/volume-1/issue-1/ijssr30304/.
Mustamin, Riska. “The Role of Formative and Summative Assessment in Improving Learning Quality and Student Learning Outcomes.” Journal of Strategy and Transformation in Educational Management 1, no. 1 (2024): 17–21. https://jostem.professorline.com/index.php/journal/article/view/4.
Oktaviani, Suci, Jumriah, Reri Suci Meisella, Susilo, dan Ventje Jany Kalukar. “Inovasi Asesmen Formatif Non Paper-Based dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia.” Jurnal Basicedu 8, no. 4 (2024): 3445–3454. https://jbasic.org/index.php/basicedu/article/view/8067.
Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2022.
Sunaryati, Titin, Dinar Sulis Al Saepi, Nabila Azzahra Chandra, Ita Rosita, dan Amanda Aprilia. “Analisis Peran Evaluasi Formatif dalam Mendukung Keberhasilan Pembelajaran Siswa Sekolah Dasar.” Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar 9, no. 3 (2024): 255–263. https://journal.unpas.ac.id/index.php/pendas/article/view/16820.
Sunaryati, Titin, Linda Novi Ardana, Nadia Vega, Putri Kirana, dan Septia Nurlaela. “Analisis Efektivitas Evaluasi Sumatif dalam Mata Pelajaran Matematika di Sekolah Dasar.” Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai 8, no. 2 (2024): 35821–35825. https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/19292.
Ulum, Saeful. “Penerapan Evaluasi Sumatif dalam Pembelajaran BTQ Kelas III SD Plus Bakti Nusantara 666 Cileunyi.” Asian Journal of Early Childhood and Elementary Education 2, no. 4 (2024): 421–432. https://ejournal.yasin-alsys.org/AJECEE/article/view/3284.
Zetra, Vica Aulia, dan Nita Putri Utami. “Analisis Pelaksanaan Evaluasi Formatif dan Evaluasi Sumatif dalam Pembelajaran Matematika di SMK N 6 Padang.” Algoritma : Jurnal Matematika, Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Kebumian dan Angkasa, 3, no. 4 (2025): 117–126. https://journal.arimsi.or.id/index.php/Algoritma/article/view/628.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 *Trifina Fitriana, Rusdiana Navlia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.











